AI Solutions
Models pointed at work
that already exists
The demo was never the hard part. We build the unglamorous eighty per cent — evaluation sets, guardrails, fallbacks and cost ceilings — so an AI feature survives its second month in production.
Capabilities
What this covers
AI & Data
AI Development
Applied AI systems built to run in production, not to demo well.
AI & Data
Generative AI
Generative systems with measured output quality and a bill you can predict.
AI & Data
Machine Learning
Forecasting, ranking and detection models that keep working after the data shifts.
AI & Data
LLM Integration
Wiring language models into systems that already have owners, SLAs and auditors.
AI & Data
AI Chatbots
Support assistants measured on resolved conversations, not on deflection statistics.
AI & Data
Intelligent Automation
Process automation that survives an exception, an audit and a system upgrade.
AI & Data
Data Engineering
Pipelines with contracts, tests and an on-call rota, not a folder of scheduled scripts.
AI & Data
Business Intelligence
One definition per metric, and a report someone actually opens on Monday morning.
How we work
The delivery model
Discovery and technical due diligence
2–3 weeksTwo engineers and a delivery lead go into your codebase, database and incident history. We read the schema, run a dependency and CVE inventory, sit with the people who actually use the system, and measure what is slow rather than accept what is reported as slow. Output is a written architecture assessment, a risk register with named owners, and a costed delivery sequence carrying a stated ±25% confidence band. Fixed fee, and the documents are yours whether or not the engagement continues.
Architecture and delivery plan
1–2 weeksWe record the decisions as architecture decision records: service boundaries, data ownership, sync versus event-driven integration, the consistency model, and what we deliberately are not building. Non-functional targets get numbers — p95 latency, concurrent users, recovery point and recovery time objectives, retention windows. You approve the plan, the team roster by name, and the definition of done before any production code is written.
Foundation sprint and first production deploy
3 weeksInfrastructure as Terraform in your cloud account, repositories in your GitHub organisation, CI with unit tests, SAST and container scanning, and Argo CD promotion into staging and production. Before feature work starts we put a thin but real slice of the system into production behind a feature flag, with dashboards, alerts and an on-call runbook attached. That deployment happens in week three and is the point at which the pipeline stops being a promise.
Iterative build
8–20 weeksTwo-week sprints, trunk-based development, deployment to production on merge behind flags. Each sprint ends with a working increment on your infrastructure, not a demo environment. You get a burn-up against the agreed scope, the DORA four metrics for the team, and an explicit list of what moved out of scope and why. The first release to real users typically lands between weeks 10 and 16, depending on integration surface.
Hardening, performance and security testing
3–4 weeksLoad testing to twice the agreed peak, with results published as latency percentiles rather than averages. Failure injection on the dependencies that matter — database failover, broker partition, third-party timeout. A third-party penetration test against the release candidate, with every high and critical finding closed before cutover and mediums scheduled with dates. Backup restore is rehearsed in full, timed, and written into the runbook.
Cutover, hypercare and handover
4–6 weeks, then ongoingMigration runs as a rehearsed sequence with a rollback path measured in minutes, usually strangler-fig routing so the legacy system stays live and reversible. Four weeks of hypercare with our engineers on your on-call rota, then a structured handover: runbooks, architecture diagrams that match the deployed system, recorded walkthroughs and paired shifts with your team. Where you keep us on, the same named engineers move to a run-and-evolve cadence.
Reading
Related writing
9 min read
Write the evaluation set before you write the prompt
Most language-model features fail because nobody agreed what correct looks like. A labelled set of 200 real cases, scored field by field and run in CI, settles the argument before it reaches a customer.
8 min read
Guardrails are a queue, not a filter
Blocking a bad model output is the easy half. The design question is what happens to the four per cent you block, who reads it, how fast, and what they are allowed to do about it.
8 min read
Set the price ceiling before you build the feature
Pick a unit — a ticket, an invoice, a search — and a number of pence it may not exceed. Everything about retrieval, routing and caching follows from that constraint, and features that cannot meet it are cheaper to cancel early.

