Atmora Tech

Industry

Model, site and cost data in one audit trail

Model data, site records and payment workflow in one auditable trail from design to handover.

Context

Technology in Real Estate & Construction

We build project controls, site capture applications, document and model management, and the valuation and payment workflow that runs between main contractors and their supply chain. Construction data is unusual in that the authoritative record is often a file — an IFC model, a drawing revision, a signed instruction — and the engineering job is to make those files queryable without losing their status as the record.

Building safety duties have made record-keeping a legal obligation with named accountable persons, so audit trails now matter as much as functionality. One caution: a digital twin with no maintained sensor estate and no owner is a screensaver with a maintenance contract. We only recommend live building models where somebody is funded to keep the instrumentation calibrated for the asset's life.

6 weeks to 4 days
lag between site progress and commercial reporting at Halden Group
290,000
model elements versioned and queryable across a single scheme
94%
of payment notices issued inside the statutory window after workflow rollout

Challenges

What actually keeps this sector awake

Not generic disruption — the specific constraints that shape every technology decision here.

  • Model data locked inside files

    Federated IFC models are exchanged as files by email and portal upload, so no one can answer a simple question such as which doors changed between revisions without opening three authoring tools and comparing by eye.

  • The golden thread as a legal duty

    Building safety regimes require a maintained, accurate information trail from design through occupation, with accountable persons named. Most projects hold that information across shared drives, email chains and a document system nobody updated after practical completion.

  • Valuation and payment disputes

    Applications for payment, assessments, retention and variations are tracked in spreadsheets, and disagreements about what was agreed on site become adjudication. Statutory payment notice deadlines pass while the paperwork is being reconciled.

  • Cost signal arriving too late to act on

    Commercial reporting lags site reality by four to six weeks, so overruns become visible after the work causing them is complete. By the time a cost report lands, the recovery options that existed are gone.

Approach

How we address them

  • IFC ingestion into a queryable model service

    Models parsed into a queryable store with element-level history across revisions, so change between issues is a query rather than an inspection. The authoring files remain the record and stay linked to every derived answer.

  • Golden thread records with tamper-evident history

    Documents, models, instructions and inspections held with immutable versioning, accountable person assignment and structured handover packages, so the information duty is satisfied by the system rather than by a scramble at completion.

  • Valuation and payment workflow with the clock built in

    Application, assessment, notice and certificate stages with statutory deadlines tracked and escalated, supported by site evidence captured against the same work item so a dispute starts from a shared record.

  • Site capture that works without a signal

    Offline-first applications for inspections, progress and quality records, with conflict resolution designed for a site where three people record the same pour. Data reaches commercial reporting in days rather than weeks.

Start a project

Tell us what is
breaking.

We reply within one working day, and the first call is with an engineer who would actually work on it — not an account manager. If we are not the right studio for the problem, we will say so on that call.

Start a project