Atmora Tech

Data & AI platform

Automation that survives
contact with production

Atmora's automation platform runs language-model agents, document extraction and deterministic rules against the systems you already own. Every run stores its prompts, tool calls and outputs, so a failure is debugged rather than guessed at.

  • Cloud
  • Private cloud
  • On-premise
  • Hybrid

Overview

Agents, document extraction and process mining under one control plane.

Most enterprise automation stalls at the same place: a pilot that reads data well but is never trusted to write it back. The platform is built around that problem. Agents call typed tools with declared side effects, writes carry idempotency keys, and anything the model is unsure about lands in a human review queue instead of quietly entering a system of record. Process mining sits in front of the whole thing so you automate the step that actually costs money rather than the one that was easiest to demo.

It runs on your infrastructure or ours, routes work across hosted and self-hosted models through a single gateway, and keeps a replayable record of every execution. This is not a chatbot builder and it is not a general-purpose orchestration engine. If your process is stable, high volume and fully structured, a scheduled SQL job or a scripted integration will be cheaper to run and easier to certify than an agent.

11 minutes down to 90 seconds per document
Supplier invoice handling
72% of documents clear with no human touch
Straight-through processing
38% lower after gateway routing and cache reuse
Inference spend
6 weeks from kick-off, including review workflow
First agent in production

Modules

What ships in the box

  • Process Miner
  • Agent Studio
  • Document Intelligence
  • Human Review Queue
  • Model Gateway
  • Run Observability

Integrates with

  • SAP S/4HANA
  • Salesforce
  • ServiceNow
  • Microsoft 365
  • Snowflake
  • Databricks
  • Okta
  • Slack

Capabilities

What it does

  • Process discovery from event logs

    Ingest event logs from your ERP or ticketing system and get the real process graph, including the rework loops nobody documented and the median wait at each step.

  • Agent Studio with typed tools

    Agents call typed tools with declared inputs, outputs and side effects. A tool that writes to a system of record must say so, and the runtime enforces the declaration.

  • Document extraction with confidence gates

    Extract fields from invoices, bills of lading and claim forms. Anything below your confidence threshold routes to a reviewer instead of being written to the ledger silently.

  • Human review queue

    Reviewers see the source document, the extracted field and the model's alternatives side by side. Corrections are captured as labelled data for the next evaluation run.

  • Model gateway with budget controls

    Route by task across hosted and self-hosted models, with per-team token budgets, prompt cache reuse and automatic failover when a provider starts returning errors.

  • Run replay and audit trail

    Every run keeps its prompts, tool calls, retrieved passages and outputs. Replay a stored run against a new prompt version and diff the result before you promote it.

  • Evaluation harness

    Regression suites run on every prompt or model change, scored against a held-out set your own domain experts labelled. Promotion is blocked when accuracy falls past the threshold.

  • Connectors that write back

    Read-only pilots stall. Connectors for SAP, Salesforce and ServiceNow post transactions with idempotency keys, so a retried run cannot create a duplicate record.

FAQ

Questions we get asked

Do our documents or prompts get used to train models?

No. Inference runs against providers you nominate under your own contracts, or against open-weights models hosted inside your network. The gateway records what was sent and where, and you can restrict a workspace to self-hosted models only.

What happens when the model gets something wrong?

Extractions below your confidence threshold never reach a system of record; they queue for review. For agent runs, every tool call is stored with its inputs, so you can replay the run, see the decision point and correct the prompt or the tool rather than argue about what happened.

How is this different from an RPA tool?

RPA drives a user interface and breaks when the screen changes. This calls documented APIs with typed contracts and handles unstructured input, which is where RPA needs a human. For screen-scraping legacy systems with no API, RPA is still the better tool and the two coexist.

Start a project

Tell us what is
breaking.

We reply within one working day, and the first call is with an engineer who would actually work on it — not an account manager. If we are not the right studio for the problem, we will say so on that call.

Start a project